open letter to linkspam community
If I were you lot, I would knock off with the "warnings" as such. You are using them to editorialise.
When Logophilos, who talks about the every day, constant, unremitting experience of misogyny in relation to her writing choices, gets labelled "Opression Olympics" you are dismissive, demeaning, and you have made a choice about who deserves a voice. I don’t think that was the original function of the comm.
Sometimes the overall character of a person influences how they are treated by the collective.
Then it’s definitely prejudicial and editorial, and not based entirely on the actual work at hand.
This seems pretty apparent in this case.
Sometimes the overall character of a person influences how they are treated by the collective.
Then it’s definitely prejudicial and editorial, and not based entirely on the actual work at hand.
This seems pretty apparent in this case.
Sometimes the overall character of a person influences how they are treated by the collective.
Then it’s definitely prejudicial and editorial, and not based entirely on the actual work at hand.
This seems pretty apparent in this case.